Long-term safety of using local anesthetic injections in professional rugby league

Local Anesthetic, Professional Sport, Return to Play, Rugby League

Abstract

Background

Local anesthetic pain-killing injections are commonly used by some professional football teams to allow continued play for certain injuries; however, the long-term safety of this practice has not been studied.

Hypothesis

The majority of local anesthetic injections administered in professional football are helpful and safe, not leading to long-term sequelae.

Study design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

A retrospective survey was conducted of 100 players over 10 seasons who had been injected with local anesthetic on 1023 occasions for 307 injuries (81% follow-up; average follow-up, 5 years; minimum, 1 year). A comparison of match performance statistics was made from 3 seasons between players using and not using local anesthetic.

Results

The majority (98%) of players would repeat the procedure if they had their injury again, although 32% felt that there were side effects associated with the procedure (including 22% who thought that the recovery of the primary injury was delayed and 6% who thought that the injury was worsened by playing with local anesthetic). On long-term follow-up, only 6% of players had significant residual pain in the body part injected. The satisfaction rates for acromioclavicular injuries, finger injuries, rib injuries, and iliac contusions were higher than for sternum injuries, wrist injuries, and ankle injuries. Player performance between those players injected and not injected with local anesthetic was not substantially different and mainly reflected a positional bias for the players who used local anesthetic.

Conclusion

The most commonly injected injuries-acromioclavicular joint sprains, finger and rib injuries, and iliac crest contusions-appear to be quite safe (in the context of professional sport) to inject at long-term follow-up. Conversely, ankle, wrist, and sternum injections appear to be less safe. A few injuries may have been substantially worsened by playing after an injection.

Share the Post:

Relevant Articles

“Runner’s Trots”: The Real Medical Reason Endurance Athletes Sometimes Lose Bowel Control

What really happens when an elite athlete suddenly loses bowel control mid-race? The recent HYROX incident involving Australian athlete Joanna Wietrzyk put “runner’s trots” firmly in the spotlight — but exercise-induced diarrhoea, urgency and even faecal incontinence can happen to athletes at every level. During hard endurance exercise, blood is diverted away from the gut, repetitive impact can stimulate bowel activity, and heat, dehydration and pre-race nutrition can push the digestive system beyond its comfort zone. The result can be a sudden and sometimes very urgent need to go — with surprisingly little warning. So why does it happen, and can you prevent it? Here’s the real physiology behind one of endurance sport’s most awkward problems.

PRP for Knee Osteoarthritis: How Many Injections Do You Need, and How Long Does Relief Last?

If you're considering PRP for knee osteoarthritis, two of the biggest questions are how many injections are needed and how long the results may last. Recent research provides useful insight into both, with many clinical trials using a short course of 2–3 injections rather than a single treatment. Our latest evidence update looks at the durability of PRP, how platelet concentration may influence the length of benefit, and when a repeat course may be considered for patients who respond well.

Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy and PRP: Modest but Durable Benefit

Rotator cuff tendinopathy and partial-thickness tears are common causes of persistent shoulder pain, particularly when symptoms don't settle with rehabilitation alone. Research into PRP is growing, with recent trials suggesting its benefits may be modest but more durable over time compared with corticosteroid injections. Our latest evidence update explores the shoulder-specific research, including partial-thickness tears, injection technique and why precise targeting and a structured strengthening program remain important when considering PRP.