“Runner’s Trots”: The Real Medical Reason Endurance Athletes Sometimes Lose Bowel Control

Why an elite HYROX result made headlines for the wrong reason

This month, Australian HYROX athlete Joanna Wietrzyk became an unwilling case study in exercise physiology after experiencing sudden faecal incontinence mid-race at a HYROX event in Beijing — and going on to win the division anyway. The clip went viral, HYROX’s co-founder publicly apologised for how officials handled it, and the organisation has since flagged new competition rules around health and hygiene incidents.

Beyond the headlines, the episode is a good opportunity to explain a phenomenon that’s far more common in endurance sport than most people realise: exercise-induced gastrointestinal (GI) distress, colloquially known as “runner’s trots.”

It's common — and it's not a sign of poor fitness

Studies of endurance athletes report GI symptoms — cramping, urgency, diarrhoea, nausea — in anywhere from 30–90% of long-distance runners, with lower-GI symptoms like urgency and diarrhoea especially prevalent in high-impact sports like running and, by extension, hybrid events like HYROX. It occurs across all levels of competitor, from recreational runners to elite athletes, and is generally unrelated to underlying illness.

What's actually happening physiologically

Three overlapping mechanisms are usually implicated:

1. Blood flow redistribution (“splanchnic hypoperfusion”)

During sustained, high-intensity exercise, the body prioritises blood flow to working muscles, skin (for cooling) and the heart and lungs — at the expense of the gut. Blood flow to the intestines can drop substantially during intense effort. This relative ischaemia irritates the intestinal lining, increases gut permeability, and disrupts normal fluid and nutrient absorption, all of which can trigger loose stools and urgency.

2. Mechanical jostling

The repetitive impact of running physically jars the abdominal organs against each other and the abdominal wall. This is thought to stimulate intestinal motility and contribute to the sudden, hard-to-ignore urge to defecate — one reason lower-GI symptoms are more common in runners than in low-impact endurance sports like cycling or swimming.

3. Altered gut motility and permeability

Intense exercise speeds transit time through the GI tract and increases intestinal permeability (sometimes measured via markers like I-FABP). Interestingly, research suggests these physiological changes occur in most athletes during hard efforts, whether or not they go on to develop symptoms — so susceptibility likely also depends on individual gut sensitivity, hydration status, prior nutrition, heat exposure, and race-day anxiety.

Why it can escalate quickly, with little warning

Several factors compound the risk in longer, harder efforts:

  • Duration and intensity — symptoms are more common and more severe in events lasting over ~2 hours and at higher exertion (above roughly 60% VO2 max) — squarely in the zone of a competitive HYROX effort.
  • Heat and dehydration — both worsen splanchnic blood flow diversion and gut permeability.
  • Pre-race nutrition — high-fibre, high-fat, or high-sugar foods/gels close to competition can overwhelm a gut already under stress.
  • Underlying sensitivities — undiagnosed lactose intolerance, IBS, or IBD can lower the threshold considerably.

Critically, once urgency hits during a race, there is often very little warning window between “I might need a bathroom” and loss of control — which is exactly why incidents like this can happen to elite, experienced athletes with no prior history of GI issues.

Practical prevention

  • Avoid high-fibre, high-fat or high-sugar meals in the 2–3 hours before competing.
  • Practise your race-day nutrition and hydration strategy in training — never trial anything new on race day.
  • Manage hydration and, in hot conditions, cooling strategies, to help protect gut blood flow.
  • Limit stimulants (caffeine) and gas-producing foods the day before.
  • If symptoms are recurrent, it’s worth discussing with a sports physician — occasionally there’s an underlying, manageable condition contributing.

The takeaway

What happened in Beijing wasn’t a hygiene failure or a lapse in professionalism — it’s a well-documented, physiologically explainable consequence of pushing the body to its limits under heat and load. It happens to age-group athletes and world-record holders alike.

If anything, it’s a reminder of just how much the gut has to sacrifice to keep the legs moving.

This article is general information and doesn’t replace individual medical advice. If you experience recurrent or severe exercise-related GI symptoms, see your GP or a sports physician.

Share the Post:

Relevant Articles

PRP for Knee Osteoarthritis: How Many Injections Do You Need, and How Long Does Relief Last?

If you're considering PRP for knee osteoarthritis, two of the biggest questions are how many injections are needed and how long the results may last. Recent research provides useful insight into both, with many clinical trials using a short course of 2–3 injections rather than a single treatment. Our latest evidence update looks at the durability of PRP, how platelet concentration may influence the length of benefit, and when a repeat course may be considered for patients who respond well.

Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy and PRP: Modest but Durable Benefit

Rotator cuff tendinopathy and partial-thickness tears are common causes of persistent shoulder pain, particularly when symptoms don't settle with rehabilitation alone. Research into PRP is growing, with recent trials suggesting its benefits may be modest but more durable over time compared with corticosteroid injections. Our latest evidence update explores the shoulder-specific research, including partial-thickness tears, injection technique and why precise targeting and a structured strengthening program remain important when considering PRP.

Plantar Fasciopathy and PRP: How Does It Compare to Steroid Injections?

Plantar fasciopathy can cause persistent, often frustrating heel pain when conservative treatments haven't provided enough relief. While corticosteroid injections may provide faster short-term improvement, research suggests PRP may offer greater benefits as symptoms are followed over the longer term. Our latest evidence update examines the research comparing PRP and corticosteroid injections, including differences in pain relief, ultrasound findings and outcomes at six months and beyond.